However, you could argue that 98% got it wrong and there's a (really small) chance those 2% of

However, you could argue that 98% got it wrong and there's a (really small) chance those 2% of studies actually have got it right. So, a team of seven climate scientists and meteorologists decided to give climate contrarians the benefit of the doubt, picked half of their more popular studies, and tried to redo them. (The hallmark of a good scientific paper is that it's reproducible, meaning another scientist can do the same experiment and get the same or similar results.). What happened? Beyond being unable to replicate most of the results, the team discovered major flaws in the papers. In fact, many papers left out essential data, and some even ignored basic physics. ClimateChangeDenial