“Essentially, when we’re looking for something that constitutes defamation, we’re looking at two things,” he explained. “Firstly, for it to be defamation, the statement or action needs to be either clearly false or presenting information that is clearly false. Secondly, that statement or action needs to cause real, demonstrable harm to the victim and their wellbeing.
“It is my understanding that Craig has said and done many things that fit those criteria.”
Brilliant satire.